Scoping and covenant read
Before the engagement letter
We read the agreement that created the requirement and confirm the level of assurance it actually calls for.
Home / Services / Accounting / Audits & reviews
Financial statement engagements for lenders, investors, bonding agents and grantors, at the level of assurance your reader requires, not the most expensive one available.
Audit, review and compilation engagements for privately held companies, employee benefit plans and nonprofit organizations, performed under AICPA standards and subject to external peer review.
Companies routinely buy an audit when the loan agreement asks for a review, and a review when a compilation would satisfy every reader of the statements. The difference in fee is substantial, and nobody has an incentive to point it out. We read the covenant before we quote.
Where an audit genuinely is required, the experience is mostly determined by planning. We agree the timetable and the request list months ahead, do the risk assessment early, and ask for documents once rather than in a rolling stream that consumes your controller for six weeks.
You get the same team back the following year. The second audit is materially less disruptive than the first for exactly that reason: nobody is relearning your revenue recognition or rediscovering why the inventory reserve is calculated the way it is.
Independence rules mean we cannot both audit a company and keep its books. Where you need both, we will say so plainly at the outset and help you structure it properly rather than discovering the conflict halfway through.
We will tell you when a cheaper level of service satisfies your requirement. That conversation happens before the engagement letter.
The highest level of assurance, with substantive testing and an opinion. Required by most institutional lenders, investors and larger grantors.
Limited assurance through analytical procedures and inquiry. Satisfies a large share of bank covenants at a fraction of an audit fee.
Statements presented in proper form without assurance, often sufficient for a smaller credit facility or an internal reader.
Form 5500 audits for plans over the participant threshold, run to a calendar that does not collide with your year-end.
Statements under the nonprofit reporting framework, including functional expense allocation and single audit coordination where applicable.
Targeted testing where a reader needs comfort on one specific thing rather than on the statements as a whole.
A well-planned audit is a short interruption. A poorly planned one occupies your finance team for a quarter.
Before the engagement letter
We read the agreement that created the requirement and confirm the level of assurance it actually calls for.
Two to three months out
Timetable agreed, request list issued once and in full, and the significant risks identified before anyone arrives on site.
A defined window
A named team with continuity year over year. Open items are tracked on a shared list so nobody is guessing what is outstanding.
To an agreed date
Statements and opinion issued on schedule, plus a management letter that identifies control weaknesses in language your board can act on.
These sit next to each other for a reason: most engagements draw on two or three of them at once.
Accounting overviewSend us the covenant or the grant condition. We will read it and tell you the minimum that satisfies it.